Eschenbach and More Show Tunes
The Sunday concert (I don't know what
to call it, is 5 PM afternoon or evening?) seemed like a microcosm of
the whole Ravinia experience. A small crowd witnessed an
underutilized orchestra swelter through a program of Broadway show
music. The most disturbing fact is that may have been the best
concert of the week.
If anyone needs help filling out their
Ravinia scorecard, my records show the following after two weeks:
Total concerts: 6
Pops concerts: 3 (.500 average)
Concerts with Patti Lupone: 0
Usually all sorts of interesting things
happen when Christoph Eschenbach comes to town. One of the more
mundane yet annoying is that the rehearsal schedule gets all
cockeyed.
Thursday
10-12:30
Brahms Symphony
1:30-4
Dvorak Symphony
Brahms Double
Friday:
2:30-5
Dvorak Symphony
Brahms Symphony
Korngold violin concerto
At first glance the above seems
unremarkable, until one realizes that the two Brahms pieces were on
the Friday concert, the Dvorak and Korngold on Saturday. Now, not
everyone plays every concert, and the seating arrangement changes
from night to night, so creating these ungodly rehearsal 'sandwiches'
makes for all sorts of pains in all sorts of backsides. I think even
with their banks of computers, the personnel office can't keep up
with this sort of nonsense. In an effort to limit my exposure to any
sort of Eschenbacchanalia, and with the full knowledge that by doing
so I might deny myself the fruits of a potential of overtime bonanza,
I scheduled a day off for Saturday. On Friday afternoon I sat
blissfully under the stage waiting while the orchestra rehearsed
Dvorak, unaware of the personnel office calling my home and inquiring
as to my whereabouts, causing my wife either undue worry or premature
celebration at the thought I might have met either an untimely or
long overdue demise en-route to the rehearsal.
The preceding may seem like the most
trivial sort of griping, and I will plead guilty to the charge after
making a brief statement in defense.
Music is (quite obviously) an art which
unfolds in time. A large part of what we concern ourselves with as
musicians is (or ought to be) the premeditated and thoughtful
placement of elements in time. Am I together with so-and-so? At
what rate are we getting faster, slower, louder, softer? Is that
pizzicato (ahem) a shade too early? These are our concerns.
It is therefore my contention that this
temporal sensitivity makes the poor, sloppy, or thoughtless usage of
time all the more irritating. It is telling that the conductors who
waste time in rehearsal, end early one day, go too long the next,
don't know when rehearsal starts or ends, are often the same fellows
who have no sense of how to make a transition, pace a ritardando, and
so on, the temporal insensitivity manifesting itself in both macro
and the micro mismanagement of time. With that, I rest my case and
await sentencing.
On Friday evening, solists Benedetti
and Elschenbroich
played admirably, avoiding the scylla and charyibdiss of the Brahms
double. The piece can very easily lapse into sounding like two cats
either fighting or mating, virtually indistinguishable to the
untrained ear. As Brahms apparently only wrote three symphonies, it
was odd the one we played Friday bore the label #4. The performance
took all the usual pratfalls, along with a few extra curves thrown
from the podium. In the 3rd
movement of the part I was reading from, I noticed the italicized
marking gracioso, which gave me a chuckle, as this poor piece always
gets the most pugilistic pounding. Perhaps it's the triangle. The
last movement, Allegro energico e passionato, began at a promising
pace but, reaching the middle section, lapsed into the
all-too-familiar dirge funebre.
I
can never tell which of the pops shows are going to be well attended.
Celebrating her 85th
birthday, which has to make her one of the oldest people to appear
before our orchestra (not counting those on the podium), Barbara Cook
sang to a smallish, Mahler 6th
sized crowd. Her elegant stylings were more in evidence when she
sang with the combo. Fortunately, the orchestra sat out half her
numbers but still managed to collect some overtime by evening's end.
If anyone had given it a moment's
thought, they could have put an intermission in that concert, lumped
all the orchestral pieces on the first half, dismissed the orchestra
altogether and still ended on a high note, all while saving a little
money – just sayin.
2 comments:
"Allegro energico e passionato, began at a promising pace but, reaching the middle section, lapsed into the all-too-familiar dirge funebre."
One of my all-time pet peeves. Brahms clearly indicates that the quarter notes in the middle section should equal the quarter notes in the previous music. The time signature changes from 3/4 to 3/2, so there is a natural halving of the tempo, but it should be no slower than that. If you actually do it this way, the underlying Chaconne theme is discernible, and the flute solo has a noble and simple Bachian quality. Unfortunately, even the finest flute players, aided and abetted by the clueless conductors that now populate the landscape, cannot resist the urge to love this solo to death, as if it were a Verdi recitative or something. The only guy I ever heard make this part of the piece work was Bernard Haitink. Eschenbach's version was worse than most, of course, but not by much.
My favorite conductors were often active composers. Most have higher insight-to-ego quotients (though sometimes due to extraordinary insight). Boulez provides an example. His TV broadcast Mahler 7 (http://video.pbs.org/video/1626498784/) contained a second movement that really felt like a hike in the mountain wilderness as Mahler intended. Usually this movement is more like Central Park or even the Bronx Zoo, something the musicians can sink their virtuosic teeth into. Mahler was quite capable of unfolding his images so doesn't require our embellishments. Extra effects soon take us off his path. On the other hand, how many remote mountain hikers are present in audience or orchestra? The Romantic lifestyle and environment are kaput, so maybe contemporizing effacements should be expected, even justified. We relate more to peacocks than to nightingales.
How many in the audience are even aware of graciosos or alla breves? The most recent Schubert 9th even added an accelerando into its tweaked-up alla breve section. In a parting nod to structure, the conductor abruptly braked to the original tempo so that the final bars were a mirror image of the opening, as Schubert intended. It was a nice, brisk performance which ignored Schubert's puzzle-perfect proportions and therefore diminished what was perhaps his greater message, the contrasting effects of lyrical and symphonic-motivic styles. Conductor-composers are much more likely to help us hear the graciosos and alla breves in convincing if not revelatory ways. It was natural that Boulez, Bernstein, Rosbaud, Furtwangler, Skrowaczewski, Silvestri, Maderna all strove to assert the primacy of composer over conductor. Even their libertarian excesses, such as Mahler rewriting passages, were respectful efforts aimed to bring clarity to another composer's intentions.
My other favorite conductors are nearly all former musicians, such as Jaap van Zweden. Care to take the plunge, Michael?
Stan Collins
Post a Comment