In
years past, announcement of the schedule of concerts for a new
season has sometimes been cause for great anticipation and optimism,
while at other times it has provided motivation for me to double
check the status of my retirement portfolio. This year, I decided to
take a more dispassionate, data-centered approach to news of the
2018-2019 season1 by making a list of every work scheduled
to be performed, including the year of composition, duration, number
of performances, as well as a few details about the composer, and
then seeing what the data had to say about it.
I
made a few choices about what not to include. Tour repertoire tends
to be even more repetitive than the season as a whole and, if I had
to guess, is also more conservative. Since tour programs don't
represent what we offer our hometown audience, I felt justified in
leaving those programs out of the data set. I also omitted the
so-called Film Nights, although they occupy two full weeks of next
season, plus a number of performances interpolated into otherwise
'normal' weeks. I just don't feel those qualify as concerts, and I
certainly didn't feel like counting Star Wars, Harry Potter, and the
like, as 20th or 21st century music, so those
didn't make the list. Besides those choices, anything offered as
part of a subscription concert (minus the Star Spangled Banner) was included, as were the free outdoor
concert and the Symphony Ball. Repertoire from concerts billed as
Members of the {redacted}SO or from educational programs was not
included.
I
used timings provided in our season schedule, which, I believe,
are based on past performances. Actual performance times can vary
wildly, depending who is on the podium. (We recently completed
performances of a work listed in our schedule at 51 minutes that came
in at about 65 minutes every night.) For new works, and others for
which no timing was given, I made estimates based on a total concert
time of 120 minutes. Seemingly reliable dates of composition were
readily available online for most pieces. Where there was some
question about the completion date, I tried to defer to the last year
a piece had been worked on. In the case of arrangements, such as the
Brahms/Schoenberg Piano Quartet, the Ives arrangements by Schuman and
Adams, I chose the date of the arrangement. I freely admit to a
couple of guesstimates. Vivaldi Piccolo concerto? 1729 sounds good
to me.
The
list I compiled came to 325 performances of 104 pieces by 57
different composers, all in all, about 157 hours of music.
Here
are a few fun facts about the upcoming season.
Party
Like It's 1893
Confirming
my suspicion that we are somewhat behind the times, the median year
of composition for pieces scheduled to be performed next season
turned out to be 1893. President Cleveland is welcome in the
auditorium any time. I have no idea how this compares to past
seasons, but my feeling is that, as orchestral time runs slower than
normal time, we are gradually falling further and further behind.
I'm still hoping that, before I retire sometime in the 21st
century, we abandon our 18th century dress code, to
mention one thing.
Better
off dead?
Of
the 57 composers, 62 were alive at the time of this
writing, their pieces receiving 18 of the 325 performances. About 4 of the 157
hours of music scheduled for next season was written by someone who
still has a pulse. I'm praying for all of their continued good health.
The
winners are
Mozart - 32 performances of 10 different pieces.
Brahms - 20 performances of 6 different pieces.
One
hit wonders
(composers with only one performance)
Johann
Strauss Jr
Josef
Strauss
Puccini
Yes,
that last one is a real shocker. The first two, not so much.
Year
of the Woman? Think again.
Performances
of works by female composers, 0.
Alex
Ross had a nice comment on this.
One
index of backward thinking is a lack of female composers. If an
orchestra is programming few female composers, it is almost certainly
playing little new music, since any serious consideration of the
music of our time would have to include a large number of women.
Composer(s)
of color
William
Grant Still
Mind
the Gaps
Repertoire
spans the period 1729 – 2019. The longest gap between pieces is 32
years (1741-1773), separating the Handel Messiah
and Mozart symphony
25, more or less a concession that the
orchestra rarely dips its toe into the Baroque or early classical
eras anymore. From 1773 and 1969 there is never a gap of more than 10
years between pieces, although the interval between the Chopin Piano
concerto (1830) and Wagner Rienzi
(1840) is just that. As expected, most of the
action happens around the end of the 19th
century and the beginning of the 20th.
Although the current decade is represented by three new works, the
lack of music from the recent past comes as more of a disappointment
than a surprise. Lately, I'm wondering how much of music appreciation
involves nostalgia. Since there needs to be a certain passage of time
before nostalgia takes hold, the recent past is relatively
unattractive in a nostalgic sense. One would hate to think of music
programmers as being enamored of the latest shiny bauble, like the
spoiled child who, upon receiving a new toy at every occasion,
quickly loses interest in the previous acquisitions and shoves them
into a closet to molder, forgotten.
The gaps in programming became more obvious when I grouped the repertoire by decade. (y-axis is number of performances)
There
is a twenty year gap between the Schuman 9th Symphony
(1969) and the Adams arrangement of Ives At the River (1989), and
then another twenty years to Daugherty's Letters to Mrs Bixby (2009).
Nothing from the 1970s, or 1990s, and virtually nothing from the
'80s or the '00s. In fact, since the Adams/Ives is an arrangement by
one composer of an earlier arrangement by another, one could make the
argument that the real gap is an astonishing 40 years, 1969 – 2009.
To pile on with the bleak news, Adams/Ives, Daugherty, as well as
Corigliano's One sweet Morning, are all short vocal pieces, meaning
that all of the repertoire from 1970 – 2016 totals about 15 minutes
of music.
We
recently premiered a commissioned work, a fine piece by my colleague
Max Raimi. In spite of a good reception from the public, musicians,
and, crucially, the Music Director, one wonders if the piece will suffer the same fate as so many of our commissions and world
premiers and never be heard in our hall again. Perhaps, as part of the
commission process, the orchestra could commit to more than one
performance, maybe 3 over 5 years, or some similar arrangement.
(Certainly, in case the submitted work was truly execrable, some sort
of veto process could be included.) As so many of our
much-ballyhooed commissioned or premiered works receive one
performance before disappearing without a trace, I often find myself
imagining a group of laborers on lunch break in a Belfast shipyard,
circa 1913. Remember that ship we launched last year? What was is
called? Titanic, or something, name escapes me. Wonder what became
of that? Shrugging, they turn back to building the next boat.
1
the 'downtown' season, concerts at {redacted} between September 20,
2018 and June 29, 2019
2
includes John Adams, arranger of Ives, At the River
2 comments:
What do I owe you, Mike?
1 Bass concerto, heavy on the harmonics!
Post a Comment